Essays and short writing on cryonics, life extension, decision-making under uncertainty, and the practical paperwork of preservation.
When you arrange cryopreservation, the real risk isn't the science - it's a relative who objects at the worst possible moment. Here is how Pennsylvania's Statement of Contrary Intent keeps your wishes in control, plus the full paperwork checklist and what it actually costs.
Read →If time is infinite and your existence has a non-zero probability, then your pattern recurs without end, and most lives that have ever existed were brutal. Here is the logical case for why cryonics is the one rational way to interrupt that cycle.
Read →A wearable that detects death and alerts your standby team could transform a cryonics outcome. Rings put the sensor where pulse-ox belongs, the finger, but the closed, non-real-time data pipeline is the real problem.
Read →We can already revive cells, tissues, and whole organisms from the cold, so why does mainstream science still treat cryonics as pseudoscience? Two reasons matter most: one historical, and one about how little we actually understand consciousness.
Read →Neil deGrasse Tyson dismissed cryonics as a scam. Here is the letter I wrote him, and why a trusted scientist's offhand words could cost real lives.
Read →ASC won the Brain Preservation Prize and powers Nectome. So why stick with ordinary vitrification? A practical case for revival over upload.
Read →A short note on the reasoning behind the book - why cryonics is best understood as a decision made under uncertainty, not a leap of faith.
Read →